Friday, April 28, 2006

Eat less, live more

DIETING according to an old joke, may not actually make you live longer, but it sure feels that way.


Nevertheless, evidence has been accumulating since the 1930s that calorie restriction—reducing an animal's energy intake below its energy expenditure—extends lifespan and delays the onset of age-related diseases in rats, dogs, fish and monkeys.


Such results have inspired thousands of people to put up with constant hunger in the hope of living longer, healthier lives. They have also led to a search for drugs that mimic the effects of calorie restriction without the pain of going on an actual diet.

Initial results of the first systematic investigation into the matter, known as CALERIE (Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy), was sponsored by America's National Institutes of Health.

It took 48 men and women aged between 25 and 50 and assigned them randomly to either a control group or a calorie-restriction regime. Those in the second group were required to cut their calorie intake for six months to 75% of that needed to maintain their weight.


The CALERIE study is a landmark in the history of the field, because its subjects were either of normal weight or only slightly overweight.

At a molecular level, CALERIE suggests these advantages are real.

For example, those on restricted diets had lower insulin resistance (high resistance is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes) and lower levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (high levels are a risk factor for heart disease). They showed drops in body temperature and blood-insulin levels—both phenomena that have been seen in long-lived, calorie-restricted animals. They also suffered less oxidative damage to their DNA.

It was of no wonder that women lived longer than men.

Thursday, April 27, 2006

food that you found in the streets of Korea

Some of the food from interesting reads of korea blogs:

Eating at such stalls is inexpensive (by Korean standards). Typically a skewer of anything is KRW1,000 - KRW2,000. The price for a plate of teokbokgi varies, depending on what you load it with but generally it shouldn't cost more than KRW2,000 - KRW3,000.

This is odeng, fish cake skewered into a sausage-like form. I actually enjoy the soup more!! The soup is made from turnips and anchovy stock and peppered liberally. Served in paper cups. Very nice on a cold night.

Close-up of the flour-battered deep fried chicken fillet, smothered in sweet and spicy sauce. KRW2,000

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

LUP update

One day, I took a stroll at our nighbourhood estate.
I noticed that some of our 4-room flat had their Lift upgrading programmes. Since 5-room already have lift stops at every floor, that left only 3-room and 4-room flats to be upgraded.

The more I observed, it seemed that only 4-room flats had their lift upgraded, but none so far 3-room flats.

Checked the latest upgrade programmes, and noted that we have to wait for 10 years i.e. 2016 as our block (which was 3-room flat-type) was on the last of the list.

Although we are at lift-landing floor, some of neighbours who are not will have to wait for quite sometime.

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Soju


Soju (소주)is a notorious rice liquor sold all over the place in Korea.

It mainly comes in little green bottles, but is also known to show up in little juice boxes and big plastic bottles that look like mineral water. At about 20% (40 proof) alcohol its not very strong, but at 1000 won in a convenience store and 3000 won at a bar, its a very cheap drunk.

In Seoul there are 2 main brands: Chamisul (참이슬) and San (산).

San is the one with the picture of a mountain on the bottle.

The Chamisul brand comes from two different distilleries, one in Kyeonggido(경기도) and the other in Chungbuk Cheongwon(충북 청원). The Kyeonggido soju is more bitter than its counterpart.

You can find out which distillery produced a certain bottle of Chamisul by reading the far right edge of the front label. There are other brands of soju in different parts of Korea.

neigbhours

One of friends lived in 5-rooms flat. He has been living there for 10-15 years.
He has peaceful nights after he came back from work and able to have a good rest, watched some TV programmes before turning in.

However his peace was broken when his neignbours on top of his flat had rented out the whole flat to a group of non-Singaporeans.

And they made plenty of noises. When their friends came, it was further agravated when they drank beer, and enjoyed themselves with loud music, louding talking and shouting until 3-4 am in the morning.

My friend has no choice but to call police. When they came, they did not quiet down, but instead challenged the police. The day after became even worse as they made a lot of noise, by shifting their furnitures unneccessary, dropping objects which cause a lot of banging sound just so to irritate him and his family.

He referred this case to MP and MP told him to complain to police and MP also wrote a letter to the flat-owner and National Environment Agency(NEA) of the noise pollutions.

Finally the noise subsized and in the meantime, he has found a new flat and will be moving in soon.

Monday, April 24, 2006

Zhuangzi


Laozi's had a most famous follower, Zhuang Zi.

In general, Zhuangzi's philosophy arguing that our life is limited and things to know are unlimited.

To use the limited to pursue the unlimited, he said, was foolish. Our language, cognition, etc. are all biased with our own perspective so we should be hesitant in concluding that our conclusions are equally right for all things (wanwu).

We must be wary of our tendency to adopt fixed or dogmatic judgments, evaluations, and standards based on a narrow viewpoint, since this leads to conflict and frustration

Zhuangzi's thought can also be considered a precursor of multiculturalism and pluralism of systems of value. His pluralism even leads him to doubt the basis of pragmatic arguments (that a course of action preserves our lives) since this presupposes that life is good and death bad. In the fourth section of "The Great Happiness" (至樂 zhìlè, the eighteenth chapter of the book), Zhuangzi expresses pity to a skull he sees lying at the side of the road. Zhuangzi laments that the skull is now dead, but the skull retorts, "How do you know it's bad to be dead?"


Another example points out that there is no universal standard of beauty. This is taken from the chapter "On Arranging Things", also called "Discussion of Setting Things Right" or, in Burton Watson's translation, "Discussion on Making All Things Equal" (齊物論 qí wù lùn, the second chapter of the book):

Mao Qiang and Li Ji [two beautiful courtesans] are what people consider beautiful, but if fish see them they will swim into the depths; if birds see them, they will fly away into the air; if deer see them, they will gallop away. Among these four, who knows what is rightly beautiful in the world?


One of his well-known part of the book is also found in the chapter "On Arranging Things".

This section, which is usually called "Zhuangzi dreamed he was a butterfly" (莊周夢蝶 Zhuāng Zhōu mèng dié), relates that one night Zhuangzi dreamed that he was a carefree butterfly flying happily.

After he woke up, he wondered how he could determine whether he was Zhuangzi who had just finished dreaming he was a butterfly, or a butterfly who had just started dreaming he was Zhuangzi. It hints at many questions in the philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, and epistemology. The name of the passage has become a common Chinese idiom, and has spread into Western languages as well.

Zhuangzi's philosophy was very influential in the development of Chinese Buddhism, especially Chan, and Zen which evolved out of Chan. Zhuangzi's points about the limitations of language and the importance of being spontaneous, in particular, were strongly influential in the development of Chan.

Note: The film, "Matrix" used some of these thinking from ZhuangZi. When we woke up, is it a dream or reality? Are we dreaming the things we did are real or in our dream?

Friday, April 21, 2006

Taoism


One of Chinese oldest thinking was Laozi.

He developed the concept of "Tao", often translated as "the Way", and widened its meaning to an inherent order or property of the universe: "The way Nature is".

He highlighted the concept of wei-wu-wei, or "action through inaction". This does not mean that one should sit around and do nothing, but that one should avoid explicit intentions, strong will, and proactive action; one can reach real efficiency by following the way things spontaneously increase or decrease.

Actions taken in accordance with Tao are easier and more productive than actively attempting to counter it. Laozi believed that violence should be avoided when possible, and that military victory was an occasion to mourn the necessity of using force against another living thing, rather than an occasion for triumphant celebrations.

Similar to the counter arguments put foward by Plato in the Republic on various form of government, the Laozi indicated that codified laws and rules result in society becoming more difficult to manage.

Thursday, April 20, 2006

A better tomorrow


In one of my school day, our groups decided to watch the movie," a Better Tommorrow" after the hectic examinations. That day, we went to Bukit Merah Theatre which has since closed down.

It was quite exciting and interesting as we boys liked the thrill of gun-fighting, not forgetting the his slow-motion gun-fighting sequence and also his own action style by director John Woo, frame by frame, you can actually watch the beauty when they fought in close contact.

Leslie Cheung, one of the main actors has since passed away, but his acting was superb.

This film was John Woo's first tense, bloody gangster epic, which he continued on futher on many other movies: Face off, Mission impossible II

After the show, we went to macdonald and had our late lunch.

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

How To Know You Lived Too Long in Korea Now That You're Back Home


taken from lost-in-korea.blogspot.com,
some of the funny reads:
1. You habitually bow your head to people.
2. You've called your mother Ajuma more than 3 times
3. You refer to all your friends as foreigners
4. Your friends call the humane society because your dog's ears are pink and blue..

Have fun, cheers!!

and

some funny Konglish (Korean-English)

singapore 2020


Here we are in 2006, some wild guesses that may happened in 17 year' time in 2020.

By 2020, assuming that immigration remained unchanged at 10% per annum, we will have 6 million persons, out of half will be foreigners and another 10-20% who have chosen Singapore as Permanent Residents. Some may used it as a gateway to other countries such as USA, Australia, Canada and requlished the Singapore PR status and became PR of their destination. They will formed two third of the populations.

Also, there may be 3 million Singaporeans (including PR), assuming birth rate remained at 1.2%.

Some of the wildest guess.

Tuesday, April 18, 2006

funny pictures


spotkick


Help!!!


Me and Other Me

globalization

'Globalization' is a favourite catchphrase of journalists and politicians. It has also become a key idea for business theory and practice, and entered academic debates. But what people mean by 'globalization' is often confused and confusing.

'Globalization' is commonly used as a shorthand way of describing the spread and connectedness of production, communication and technologies across the world. That spread has involved the interlacing of economic and cultural activity.

Globalization in the sense of connectivity in economic and cultural life across the world, has been growing for centuries. However, many believe the current situation is of a fundamentally different order to what has gone before. The speed of communication and exchange, the complexity and size of the networks involved, and the sheer volume of trade, interaction and risk give what we now label as 'globalization' a peculiar force.

With increased economic interconnection has come deep-seated political changes - poorer, 'peripheral', countries have become even more dependent on activities in 'central' economies such as the USA where capital and technical expertise tend to be located.

There has also been a shift in power away from the nation state and toward multinational corporations. We have also witnessed the rise and globalization of the 'brand'. It isn't just that large corporations operate across many different countries - they have also developed and marketed products that could be just as well sold in Peking as in Washington. Brands like Coca Cola, Nike, Sony, and a host of others have become part of the fabric of vast numbers of people's lives.

Globalization involves the diffusion of ideas, practices and technologies. It is something more than internationalization and universalization.

Globalization, thus, has powerful economic, political, cultural and social dimensions:-

1.de-localization and supraterritoriality;
2.the speed and power of technological innovation and the associated growth of risk;
3.the rise of multinational corporations; and
4.the extent to which the moves towards the creation of (global) free markets to leads to instability and division.


Globalization: delocalization and supraterritoriality
Manuel Castells (1996) has argued of the twentieth century, a new economy emerged around the world. He characterizes it as a new brand of capitalism that has three fundamental features:

Productivity and competitiveness are, by and large, a function of knowledge generation and information processing; firms and territories are organized in networks of production, management and distribution; the core economic activities are global - that is, they have the capacity to work as a unit in real time, or chosen time, on a planetary scale. (Castells 2001: 52)


Not everything is global, of course.
Most employment, for example, is local or regional - but 'strategically crucial activities and economic factors are networked around a globalized system of inputs and outputs' (Castells 2001: 52). What happens in local neighbourhoods is increasingly influenced by the activities of people and systems operating many miles away. For example, movements in the world commodity and money markets can have a very significant impact upon people's lives across the globe. People and systems are increasingly interdependent.

The starting point for understanding the world today is not the size of its GDP or the destructive power of its weapons systems, but the fact that it is so much more joined together than before. It may look like it is made up of separate and sovereign individuals, firms, nations or cities, but the deeper reality is one of multiple connections. (Mulgan 1998: 3)

Businesses are classic example of this. As Castells (2001) noted they are organized around networks of production, management and distribution. Those that are successful have to be able to respond quickly to change - both in the market and in production. Sophisticated information systems are essential in such globalization.

Globalization and the decline in power of national governments. It isn't just individuals and neighbourhood institutions that have felt the impact of de-localization. A major causality of this process has been a decline in the power of national governments to direct and influence their economies (especially with regard to macroeconomic management). Shifts in economic activity in say, Japan or the United States, are felt in countries all over the globe. The internationalization of financial markets, of technology and of some manufacturing and services bring with them a new set of limitations upon the freedom of action of nation states.

In other words, the impact of globalization is less about the direct way in which specific policy choices are made, as the shaping and reshaping of social relations within all countries.


Globalization and the knowledge economy. Earlier we saw Castells making the point that productivity and competitiveness are, by and large, a function of knowledge generation and information processing. This has involved a major shift - and entails a different way of thinking about economies.

For countries in the vanguard of the world economy, the balance between knowledge and resources has shifted so far towards the former that knowledge has become perhaps the most important factor determining the standard of living - more than land, than tools, than labour. Today's most technologically advanced economies are truly knowledge-based. (World Bank 1998)

The rise of the so-called 'knowledge economy' has meant that economists have been challenged to look beyond labour and capital as the central factors of production. Paul Romer and others have argued that technology (and the knowledge on which it is based) has to be viewed as a third factor in leading economies. (Romer, 1986; 1990). Global finance, thus, becomes just one force driving economies. Knowledge capitalism: 'the drive to generate new ideas and turn them into commercial products and services which consumers want' is now just as pervasive and powerful (Leadbeater 2000: 8). Inevitably this leads onto questions around the generation and exploitation of knowledge. There is already a gaping divide between rich and poor nations - and this appears to be accelerating under 'knowledge capitalism'. There is also a growing gap within societies (and this is one of the driving forces behind the English government's Connexions strategy). Commentators like Charles Leadbeater have argued for the need to 'innovate and include' and for a recognition that successful knowledge economies have to take a democratic approach to the spread of knowledge: 'We must breed an open, inquisitive, challenging and ambitious society' (Leadbeater 2000: 235, 237). However, there are powerful counter-forces to this ideal. In recent years we have witnessed a significant growth in attempts by large corporations to claim intellectual rights over new discoveries, for example in relation to genetic research, and to reap large profits from licensing use of this 'knowledge' to others.

Globalization and risk. As well as opening up considerable possibility, the employment of new technologies, when combined with the desire for profit and this 'world-wide' reach, brings with it particular risks. Indeed, writers like Ulrich Beck (1992: 13) have argued that the gain in power from the 'techno-economic progress' is quickly being overshadowed by the production of risks. (Risks in this sense can be viewed as the probability of harm arising from technological and economic change). Hazards linked to industrial production, for example, can quickly spread beyond the immediate context in which they are generated. In other words, risks become globalized.

[Modernization risks] possess an inherent tendency towards globalization. A universalization of hazards accompanies industrial production, independent of the place where they are produced: food chains connect practically everyone on earth to everyone else. They dip under borders. (Beck 1992: 39)

As Beck (1992: 37) has argued there is a boomerang effect in globalization of this kind. Risks can catch up with those who profit or produce from them.

The basic insight lying behind all this is as simple as possible: everything which threatens life on this Earth also threatens the property and commercial interests of those who live from the commodification of life and its requisites. In this way a genuine and systematically intensifying contradiction arises between the profit and property interests that advance the industrialization process and its frequently threatening consequences, which endanger and expropriate possessions and profits (not to mention the possession and profit of life) (Beck 1992: 39).

Here we have one of the central paradoxes of what Beck has termed 'the risk society'. As knowledge has grown, so has risk. Indeed, it could be argued that the social relationships, institutions and dynamics within which knowledge is produced have accentuated the risks involved. Risk has been globalized.



Globalization and the rise of multinational corporations and branding
A further, crucial aspect of globalization is the nature and power of multinational corporations. Such companies now account for over 33 per cent of world output, and 66 per cent of world trade (Gray 1999: 62). Significantly, something like a quarter of world trade occurs within multinational corporations (op. cit). This last point is well illustrated by the operations of car manufacturers who typically source their components from plants situated in different countries. However, it is important not to run away with the idea that the sort of globalization we have been discussing involves multinationals turning, on any large scale, to transnationals:

International businesses are still largely confined to their home territory in terms of their overall business activity; they remain heavily 'nationally embedded' and continue to be multinational, rather than transnational, corporations. (Hirst and Thompson 1996: 98).

While full globalization in this organizational sense may not have occurred on a large scale, these large multinational corporations still have considerable economic and cultural power.

Globalization and the impact of multinationals on local communities. Multinationals can impact upon communities in very diverse places. First, they look to establish or contract operations (production, service and sales) in countries and regions where they can exploit cheaper labour and resources. While this can mean additional wealth flowing into those communities, this form of 'globalization' entails significant inequalities. It can also mean large scale unemployment in those communities where those industries were previously located. The wages paid in the new settings can be minimal, and worker's rights and conditions poor. For example, a 1998 survey of special economic zones in China showed that manufacturers for companies like Ralph Lauren, Adidas and Nike were paying as little as 13 cents per hour (a 'living wage' in that area is around 87 cents per hour). In the United States workers doing similar jobs might expect US$10 per hour (Klein 2001: 212).

Second, multinationals constantly seek out new or under-exploited markets. They look to increase sales - often by trying to create new needs among different target groups. One example here has been the activities of tobacco companies in southern countries. Another has been the development of the markets predominantly populated by children and young people. In fact the child and youth market has grown into one the most profitable and influential sectors. 'The young are not only prized not only for the influence they have over adult spending, but also for their own burgeoning spending power' (Kenway and Bullen 2001: 90). There is increasing evidence that this is having a deep effect; that our view of childhood (especially in northern and 'developed' countries) is increasingly the product of 'consumer-media' culture. Furthermore, that culture:

... is underpinned in the sweated work of the 'othered' children of the so-called 'Third World'. [W]ith the aid of various media, the commodity form has increasingly become central to the life of the young of the West, constructing their identities and relationships, their emotional and social worlds... [A]dults and schools have been negatively positioned in this matrix to the extent that youthful power and pleasure are constructed as that which happens elsewhere - away from adults and schools and mainly with the aid of commodities. (Kenway and Bullen 2001: 187).

Of course such commodification of everyday life is hardly new. Writers like Erich Fromm were commenting on the phenomenon in the early 1950s. However, there has been a significant acceleration and intensification (and globalization) with the rise of the brand (see below) and a heavier focus on seeking to condition children and young people to construct their identities around brands.

Third, and linked to the above, we have seen the erosion of pubic space by corporate activities. Significant areas of leisure, for example, have moved from more associational forms like clubs to privatized, commercialized activity. Giroux (2000: 10), for example, charts this with respect to young people

Young people are increasingly excluded from public spaces outside of schools that once offered them the opportunity to hang out with relative security, work with mentors, and develop their own talents and sense of self-worth. Like the concept of citizenship itself, recreational space is now privatized as commercial profit-making venture. Gone are the youth centers, city public parks, outdoor basketball courts or empty lots where kids call play stick ball. Play areas are now rented out to the highest bidder...

This movement has been well documented in the USA (particularly by Robert Putnam with respect to a decline in social capital and civic community - but did not examine in any depth the role corporations have taken). It has profound implications for the quality of life within communities and the sense of well-being that people experience.

Fourth, multinational companies can also have significant influence with regard to policy formation in many national governments and in transnational bodies such as the European Union and the World Bank (key actors within the glboalization process). They have also profited from privatization and the opening up of services. As George Monbiot has argued with respect to Britain, for example: the provision of hospitals, roads and prisons... has been deliberately tailored to meet corporate demands rather than public need' (2001: 4). He continues:

... biotechnology companies have sought to turn the food chain into a controllable commodity and [there is an] extraordinary web of influence linking them to government ministers and government agencies.... [C]orporations have come to govern key decision-making processes within the European Union and, with the British government's blessing, begun to develop a transatlantic single market, controlled and run by corporate chief executives. (Monbiot 2001: 5)

While with globalization the power of national governments over macro-economic forces may have been limited in recent years, the services and support they provide for their citizens have been seen as a considerable opportunity for corporations. In addition, national governments still have considerable influence in international organizations - and have therefore become the target of multinationals for action in this arena.

Branding and globalization. The growth of multinationals and the globalization of their impact is wrapped up with the rise of the brand.

The astronomical growth in the wealth and cultural influence of multi-national corporations over the last fifteen years can arguably be traced back to a single, seemingly innocuous idea developed by management theorists in the mid-1980s: that successful corporations must primarily produce brands, as opposed to products. (Klein 2001: 3)

As Naomi Klein (2001: 196) has suggested, 'brand builders are the new primary producers in our so-called knowledge economy'. One of the key elements that keeps companies as multinationals rather than transnationals is the extent to which they look to 'outsource' products, components and services. The logic underlying this runs something like the following:

.... corporations should not expend their finite resources on factories that will demand physical upkeep, on machines that will corrode or on employees who will certainly age and die. Instead, they should concentrate those resources in the virtual brick and mortar used to build their brands

Nike, Levi, Coca Cola and other major companies spend huge sums of money in promoting and sustaining their brands. One strategy is to try and establish particular brands as an integral part of the way people understand, or would like to see, themselves. As we have already seen with respect the operation of multinationals this has had a particular impact on children and young people (and education). There is an attempt 'to get them young'.

Significantly, the focus on brand rather than the inherent qualities of the product as well as advantaging multinationals in terms of market development also has an Achilles heel. Damage to the brand can do disproportionate harm to sales and profitability. If a brand becomes associated with failure or disgrace (for example where a sports star they use to advertise their brand is exposed as a drug-taker; or where the brand becomes associated in the public's mind with the exploitation of children - as for example has happened with some of the main trainer makers) then it can face major problems in the marketplace.

Globalization and the multinationals. While there is no doubting the growth in scale and scope of multinational corporations - the degree of control they have over the central dynamics of globalization remains limited.

In reality, they are often weak and amorphous organizations. They display the loss of authority and erosion of common values that afflicts practically all late modern social institutions. The global market is not spawning corporations which assume the past functions of sovereign states. Rather, it has weakened and hollowed out both institutions. (Gray 1999: 63)

While multinationals have played a very significant role in the growth of globalization, it is important not to overplay the degree of control they have had over the central dynamics.





A new orthodoxy became ascendant. In the USA a Democrat President renounced 'big government'; in Britain, the Labour Party abandoned its commitment to social ownership. The 'markets were in command' (Frank 2002: xv). The basic formula ran something like the following:

Privatization + Deregulation + Globalization = Turbo-capitalism = Prosperity
(Luttwak quoted by Frank 2002: 17)

As various commentators have pointed out, the push toward deregulation and 'setting markets free' that so dominated political rhetoric in many northern countries during the 1980s and 1990s was deeply flawed. For example, the central tenet of free market economics - that unregulated markets 'will of their own accord find unimprovable results for all participants' has, according to Will Hutton (1995: 237), 'now proved to be a nonsense. It does not hold in theory. It is not true'. Historically, free markets have been dependent upon state power. For markets to function over time they require a reasonable degree of political stability, a solid legal framework and a significant amount of social capital. The push to engineer free markets has contained within it the seeds of its own destruction.

The central paradox of our time can be stated thus: economic globalization does not strengthen the current regime of global laissez-faire. It works to undermine it. There is nothing in today's global market that buffers it against the social strains arising from high uneven economic development within and between the world's diverse societies. The swift waxing and waning of industries and livelihoods, the sudden shifts of production and capital, the casino of currency speculation - these conditions trigger political counter-movements that challenge the very ground rules of the global free market. (Gray 1999: 7)

Capitalism is essentially disruptive and ever-changing - and takes very different forms across the world. While it produces wealth for significant numbers of people, many others have suffered. The gap between rich and poor has widened as global capitalism has expanded. For example, David Landes (1999: xx) has calculated that the difference in income per head between the richest nation (he cited Switzerland) and the poorest non-industrial country, Mozambique, is now about 400 to 1. 'Two hundred and fifty years ago, the gap between richest and poorest was perhaps 5 to 1, and the difference between Europe and, say, East or South Asia (China or India) was around 1.5 or 2 to 1' (op. cit.).

The development of markets, the expansion of economic activity, and the extent to which growing prosperity is experienced by populations as a whole has been, and remains, deeply influenced by public policies around, for example, education, land reform and the legal framework for activity. Economists like Amartya Sen have argued that 'public action that can radically alter the outcome of local and global economic relations'. For him the:

... central issue of contention is not globalization itself, nor is it the use of the market as an institution, but the inequity in the overall balance of institutional arrangements--which produces very unequal sharing of the benefits of globalization. The question is not just whether the poor, too, gain something from globalization, but whether they get a fair share and a fair opportunity. (Sen 2002)

Strong markets require significant state and transnational intervention. To be sustained across time they also require stable social relationships and an environment of trust. Moreover, they can be organized and framed so that people throughout different societies can benefit.




Conclusion
One commentator has argued that there is a very serious case not against 'globalization',

... but against the particular version of it imposed by the world's financial elites. The brand currently ascendant needlessly widens gaps of wealth and poverty, erodes democracy, seeds instability, and fails even its own test of maximizing sustainable economic growth. (Kuttner 2002)

The gap between rich and poor countries has widened considerably. However, as Sen (2002) has commented, to 'see globalization as merely Western imperialism of ideas and beliefs (as the rhetoric often suggests) would be a serious and costly error'. He continues:

Of course, there are issues related to globalization that do connect with imperialism (the history of conquests, colonialism, and alien rule remains relevant today in many ways), and a postcolonial understanding of the world has its merits. But it would be a great mistake to see globalization primarily as a feature of imperialism. It is much bigger--much greater--than that.

For example, while the reach and power of multinationals appears to have grown significantly, neither they, nor individual national governments, have the control over macro-economic forces that they would like. Ecological and technological risks have multiplied. Globalization in the sense of connectivity in economic and cultural life across the world, is of a different order to what has gone before. As we said at the start, the speed of communication and exchange, the complexity and size of the networks involved, and the sheer volume of trade, interaction and risk give what we now label as 'globalization' a peculiar force.

All this raises particular questions for educators. Has the process of globalization eroded the autonomy of national education systems? How has it impacted on the forms that education now takes? What is the effect of an increased corporate presence and branding in education? What response should educators make? We examine these and other issues in globalization and the incorporation of education.

Monday, April 17, 2006

The road less taken

After our school lives, we applied position to work for others. Either in private or civil services sector. After working several years, some of us may left their jobs and set up companies of their own.

There they have different prospectives and faced tough challenages:- cost constraint,capital borrowing, outstanding loans, risks, manpower's turnover,regulation, licencing..etc. Some were successful while some have failed and found it hard to make it a comeback. They returned to the first place where they worked for others. These happened especially when there are economy downturns as globalisation make nations' boundary less distinctive and money are in electronics data that shifted places to places easily. Many have become bankrupt and many things that they wanted to recover from debts but could not and became worse off.

The high cost of doing business here such as land or rental are higher than in other countries, such as Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, to name a few.

For one to succeed in business, there are many have failed.

Saturday, April 15, 2006

dream

One third of our lives is spent sleeping. In your lifetime, we would've spent about 6 years of it dreaming. That is more than 2,100 days spent in a different world.
Dreams have been here as long as mankind. Back in the Roman Era, striking and significant dreams were submitted to the Senate for analysis and interpretation.

Everybody dreams. EVERYBODY! Simply because you do not remember your dream does not mean that you did not dream.

Dreams are indispensable. A lack of dream activity can mean protein deficiency or a personality disorder.We dream on average of one or two hours every night. And we often even have 4-7 dreams in one night.


Blind people do dream. Whether visual images will appear in their dream depends on whether they where blind at birth or became blind later in life. But vision is not the only sense that constitutes a dream. Sounds, tactility, and smell become hypersensitive for the blind and their dreams are based on these senses.

Five minutes after the end of the dream, half the content is forgotten. After ten minutes, 90% is lost. The word dream stems from the Middle English word, dreme which means "joy" and "music".

Men tend to dream more about other men, while women dream equally about men and women. Studies have shown that our brain waves are more active when we are dreaming than when we are awake.

Dreamers who are awakened right after REM sleep, are able to recall their dreams more vividly than those who slept through the night until morning. Physiologically speaking, researchers found that during dreaming REM sleep, males experience erections and females experience increased vaginal blood flow - no matter what the content of the dream.

In fact, "wet dreams" may not necessarily coincide with overtly sexual dream content.

People who are giving up smoking have longer and more intense dreams. Toddlers do not dream about themselves. They do not appear in their own dreams until the age of 3 or 4. If you are snoring, then you cannot be dreaming. Nightmares are common in children, typically beginning at around age 3 and occurring up to age 7-8.

Friday, April 14, 2006

Yamada Masahiro"s freeters

A NEW CLASS OF DRIFTERS

Yamada Masahiro of the Tokyo Gakugei University Faculty of Education coined the term parasaito shinguru ("parasite singles") in a 1997 article in the Nihon Keizai Shimbun (February 8, evening edition) to describe "unmarried people who, even after leaving school, continue to live with their parents and depend on them for food, clothing, and shelter."

By 1998, U.S. News and World Report had picked up the term, which it translated "parasitic singles" (October 5). Yamada expanded on his thesis with an essay titled "Kore o shôshika fukyô to naze iwanu" (Why Isn't This Called a Low-Birthrate Recession?) in the August 1998 issue of Shokun, arguing that the proliferation of childless live-at-home singles was one cause of Japan's protracted recession.

In the August 1999 issue of Voice, he painted a more detailed picture of young people gadding about spending their money on recreation, trips abroad, and designer goods (see "The Growing Crop of Spoiled Singles," Japan Echo, vol. 27, no. 3 [June 2000]). Finally, in October 1999, he published an entire book on the subject titled Parasaito shinguru no jidai (The Era of Parasite Singles; Chikuma Shobô).

Whether or not it was Yamada's intent to portray Japan's young adults as a group of spoiled brats who spend lavishly while refusing to do any work that does not catch their fancy--or, indeed, while enjoying their unemployment--this is the image that took hold as a result of his commentary. Among those taking issue with this portrayal was Genda Yûji. In an article in the April 2000 issue of Chûô Kôron, he countered that the advent of the parasite singles was the result of a social and economic structure geared to maintaining the jobs and wages of older workers (see "Don't Blame the Unmarried Breed," Japan Echo, vol. 27, no. 3).

In the essay featured in this section, Yamada branches out from his customary topic to take up the related phenomenon of "freeters" (furîtâ), the Japanese term for young people who move from one temporary job to another instead of finding stable employment as a permanent employee.

As Yamada himself notes, he has adopted a position similar to Genda's in explaining the causes of the freeter phenomenon, namely, the lack of good job opportunities. According to a survey by the Japan Institute of Labor, freeters fall into three basic categories: (1) the "on hold" group, consisting of people who have not yet found what they want to do for a living, (2) the "no choice" group, consisting of those who are settling for temporary jobs while searching for permanent employment, and (3) the "dream-pursuing" group, comprising young people trying to work their way toward professional careers.

Yamada, however, argues that all freeters can in fact be characterized as "dreamers who provide a source of cheap, disposable labor." And indeed, it is hard to dispute the contention he made in his 1999 book that all three types are pursuing unrealistic but expedient dreams.


Where women freeters are concerned, we are told that more than half are on the lookout for husbands. One might surmise that a good number are "parasites" hoping to trade in their "hosts" for a husband, conscious of the fact that their parents will not always have the means to support them. Unfortunately, given Japan's ever-rising unemployment rate and deteriorating job conditions, they are unlikely to find a spouse to fit their specifications.

Intense free-market competition, which is now being promoted as the guiding principle for the Japanese economy, operates to keep freeters trapped in limbo. The restaurant industry, for example, is being buffeted by competition so fierce that some fast-food chains have slashed prices by 50% or more. This has been hailed as a victory for free and unfettered competition, but there is a dark side to the picture as well. What keeps the restaurants afloat through all this price-cutting is cheap, disposable labor in the form of young freeters dreaming of better things down the road. Establishments that are nonetheless unable to survive the price war close down, putting these young employees out of work.

It is interesting to note that, while many of the women freeters are hoping to marry, an overwhelming majority of Japanese middle school and high school girls see no need to do so, according to an international survey by the Japan Youth Research Institute released on July 31.

Asked for their opinion of the statement "Everyone must get married," 88% of the Japanese schoolgirls disagreed. This sets Japan apart from the other countries surveyed, where a substantial portion of the schoolgirl respondents agreed with the statement: 30% in France, 38% in South Korea, and 78% in the United States. The survey results also highlighted the pessimism of Japanese teenagers regarding the future. The ratio of respondents of both sexes agreeing with the statement "The new twenty-first century is promising in many ways for humankind" was 86% for the United States, 71% for South Korea, and 64% for France, but only 34% for Japan. To judge from these survey results, children still in school have a grimmer view of life than the young masterless samurai of Japan's bleak job market.

As Yamada argues, Japan must move quickly to rebuild "young people's aspirations in the working world." The administration of Prime Minister Koizumi Jun'ichirô is talking about creating 5.3 million jobs in the service sector (including emerging industries) over the next five years.

But will these jobs provide a haven for today's freeters, most of whom are equipped with neither the drive of older laid-off workers desperate for reemployment nor the clear-eyed realism of the younger set?

University career counselors have traditionally told students to think 30 years ahead when choosing a career. But who can really see 30 years into the future? Japanese society is in an ongoing state of turmoil, and no one can say what the future will bring. The freeters have a hard time finding permanent employment in today's job market, and planning for the future is close to impossible when the future of Japanese society itself is uncertain. (Kondô Motohiro, Professor, Nihon University)

Thursday, April 13, 2006

Colours

Korean traditional art relied upon five cardinal colors, blue, red, and yellow, plus white and black. These colors should not, of course, be confused with the seven hues of the color spectrum. In Korean, even the rainbow is described as "five-colored."

These colors were considered to be closely related to the five cardinal elements of um and yang: blue with wood, red with fire, yellow with earth, white with metal, and black with water.

The arrangement of colors in traditional costumes also applied the concept of these five cosmic elements. The five-color stripe on children's sleeves is a typical example, although colors may be added or excluded.

It was hoped that the use of the cardinal elements would protect children from evil spirits. The five color stripe in the sleeves of the full court dress of queens and on the wedding garments of commoners throughout the Koryo and Choson dynasties is another example.

Regardless of personal taste, the five cardinal elements played a significant role in traditional Korean culture and deeply penetrated peoples' lives and thoughts.

note: The Koreans have strange colours combinations. As we watched Korean drama,"Dae Jang Geum", we could see bright red top with light green, light blue top with white, light purple and dark purple.

sometimes, people noted and called it funny colours, which is unique to korean who are one of the homogeneous race in the world.

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

machine-roomless elevator system

we have heard of machine-roomless elevator system from the press and it was cost-efficent as it elimated the lift machine room. Here are the details:-


It is machine-roomless elevator system with elevator machine mounted on an elevator car.

A machine-roomless elevator system (10) includes an elevator car (16) propelled by an elevator machine (32) mounted thereon and at least one flat rope (22) for suspending the elevator car (16) and providing traction therefor. Use of flat ropes combined with various roping arrangements reduces the size of the elevator machine (32) required to propel the elevator car (16). Smaller size elevator machines are more practical and result in cost savings for the elevator system (10). Additionally, placement of the elevator machine (32) on the elevator car (16) provides a safer environment for the elevator maintenance crew.

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

quotes

they are catered mostly for the foreigners and not locals..so many complaints and no actions:- NATO(No Action Talk Only)..:( on So Expensive & Nothing TO See Actually Santosa


Scantily-dressed girl incensed for getting ogled at-- girls wanted attention on them, but detest people staring. either you have them both or none. why the need to fight over women over this matter?


Why do Singaporeans migrate to Perth? one of the reasons is that living in singapore was too much stressful as we have to "sprint" for everything. we are aging nation as with china and japan. so, for economical progress, we need to outdo other by running ahead of others. there are clearly people who disagreed and became quitters.
it was their choice. their lifestyle. but for sure, when we are running away from problems, it will come back to us one day. we have to adjust our mindset.


we lived the world only once..have fun and not bored. and we are no islands, we needed ppl's companion, and of course, have confidence in yourself..cheers! on Secret blog


life is more important than the barrier. (which estimated replacement cost is around S$20). have seen barriers being rammed,so it was not uncommon.here we have a valid reasons to do so.people will understand your circumstances and may waved off the replacements cost...well, the baby could have been saved! on Ram the Gantry


actually, during the lunch time, if we took a quick nap of 15-30 minutes, it will help to improve your alertness. as we aged, we needed less sleep, and also due to our daily habit as well..cheers On Sleep

in the end we still stick to our age-old principles..for safe? On Royal French Cap

it seemed that people are working even more harder to meet their needs and commitment.. on Car saleman by day, cabbie by night


horror films are best watched during midnight...especially in the moonless night On horror movies

that'economics..the purposes of taxation was redistribution of wealth..if you noticed..the richer are getting richer as their tax rate is reduced over the years :] on Growth Dividend and Workfare Bonus


for sure what has broken cannot be mend back to its original piece..it was never the same before in this world, there is no "what if" or " if only", just get over it and move on.

have to admit that it was quite interesting, and it revolved mainly around the ladies..in korea, as in japan, men are ranked higher than women. so this series were something extraordinary...cheers on Dae Jang Geum


when the driver is women, you have to be extra careful as they tend to hestitate and you will not know what they will do next..;P on It's all FATED! (car accident)

it was like life..you can forget the pain when you choose to be..it's all up to you on Pain

Sunday, April 09, 2006

(what sports car are you?)

I'm a Ford Mustang!




You're an American classic -- fast, strong, and bold. You're not snobby or pretentious, but you have what it takes to give anyone a run for their money.


"Take the Which Sports Car Are You? quiz.

Saturday, April 08, 2006

The National Minimum Wage Act 1998 in UK

Minimum Wage Act
The National Minimum Wage Act 1998 is universally applicable to ordinary ‘workers,’ that is, anyone who has a contract to do work, except for a consumer or a client Expressly included are those working through job agencies, so they have a duty not to let their profits rake into a worker’s basic entitlement. Home-workers are also included expressly, and the Secretary of State can make order for other inclusions. The SS can also make exclusions, as has been done for au pairs and family members in family business. Those engaged in accredited training can have their entitlement reduced proportional to the hours undertaken. Excluded by the Act are fishermen paid in a share of profits, unpaid volunteers and prisoners
.

Hours are the ‘pay reference period,’ but where pay is not contractually referable to hours, such as pay by output, then the time actually worked must be ascertained. The principle is a very basic one: that hours worked should never as a whole be paid below the minimum. Excluded from ‘worked’ are periods when the worker is on industrial action, time travelling to and from work and absent periods.
When a worker is required to be awake and available for work, then they must also be paid, however this does not prevent so called ‘Zero hours contracts’ being used. That means you are guaranteed no hours, theoretically you are under no obligation, but it is strongly in your interest to be ready to work if your employer requests."


Minimum wages may have the positive effect of:

1. Reducing low-paid work, which may be unfair and exploitative.
2. Stimulating economic growth by increasing the purchasing power of workers.
3. Stimulating economic growth by discouraging labor-intensive industries, thereby encouraging more investment in capital and training.
4. Encouraging many of those who would normally take low-wage jobs to stay in (or return to) school and thus to accumulate human capital.

On the other hand, minimum wages may have the negative effects of:

1. Curbing economic growth by increasing the cost of labor.
2. Decreasing incentive for some low-skilled workers to gain skills.
3. Cause higher unemployment rates among the low skilled and uneducated labor as the price of labor increases to favor the more skilled or machines.
4. Cause workers laid off because of higher labor costs to consume government assistance thus increasing the cost of government.


The effects of minimum wage laws, both positive and negative, may be increased by 'knock-on effects'. Where unions are not strong, wages for those earning slightly more than the minimum may be reduced, while those earning less than the minimum are forced to compete for work at pay levels above their experience, skill or education.

Strong unions may be able to demand wage increases for workers already earning above the minimum wage. For example, some labor union contracts are based on a fixed percentage or dollar amount above the minimum wage. Certain public grants or taxes are based on a multiple of the minimum wage. (For example, a worker may have an exemption if his earnings are below 2.5 minimum wages.)

Friday, April 07, 2006

handshake


Heard from radio.

There was a story about a man who had worked faithfully in a company for many,many years. He was promoted and had a good salary, and enjoyed peacefull lives with his families. He was earning S$5000 per month.

Then came one day the boss hired a young chap with salary of S$2000. The boss brought the man to a good restaurant.

They have a long talk and he finally told him he needed not come tomorrow. He handed him a cheque for his years of service. The boss shook hands and wished him best of luck.

Thursday, April 06, 2006

Joan of Arc


The Early Years
She was born on January 6th around the year 1412, to Jacques and Isabelle d'Arc in the little village of Domremy, in the Barrois region (now part of "Lorraine") on the border of eastern France.

Although at the time she was born a shaky truce was still in effect between France and England, a civil war had erupted between two factions of the French Royal family which would allow the English to re-invade.

One faction, called the "Orleanists" or "Armagnacs", was led by Count Bernard VII of Armagnac and Duke Charles of Orleans (whom Joan would later regard with special warmth); their rivals, known as the "Burgundians", were led by Duke John-the-Fearless of Burgundy. The forces of his pro-English son, Philip "the Good", would later capture Joan and hand her over to the English; one of his loyal supporters, a pro-Burgundian clergyman and English advisor named Pierre Cauchon, would later arrange her conviction on their behalf.

With the French divided into warring parties and negotiations to renew the truce with England a failure, King Henry V invaded France in August of 1415 after reviving his family's faded claim to the French throne. On October 25th an Armagnac-dominated French army was cut to pieces by Henry's forces at the battle of Agincourt.

The English returned in 1417, conquering much of northern France and gaining the support (in 1419) of the new Burgundian Duke, Philip-the-Good, who agreed to recognize Henry V as the legal heir to the French throne while rejecting the rival claim of the man whom Joan would consider the rightful successor, Charles of Ponthieu (later known as Charles VII), the last heir of the Valois dynasty which had ruled France since 1328.

It was around 1424, when she was 12, that Joan said she began to have visions of Saints Catherine and Margaret (two early Christian martyrs) and St. Michael the Archangel (identified in the Bible as the commander of Heaven's armies who led the war against Satan).

Michael had been chosen in 1422 as one of the patron saints of the French Royal army (along with Saint Denis), and had long been the patron of the fortified island of Mont-St-Michel, which had been holding out against repeated English assaults. The rest of northern France was less successful: Charles gradually lost the allegiance of all the important cities north of the Loire River except for Tournai in Flanders and Vaucouleurs, near Domremy. With Paris under occupation since 1418, his court was now located in the city of Bourges-en-Berri in central France, hemmed in by hostile forces on nearly every side: pro-English Brittany to the northwest, English-occupied Normandy to the north, the Burgundian hereditary domains of Flanders, Burgundy, and Franche-Comte to the east and northeast; and the English hereditary domain of Aquitaine to the southwest.

In 1428 the situation became critical, as the English prepared to attack the city of Orleans and thereby gain control over the crucial valley of the Loire River, the northern perimeter of Charles' dwindling domain.

It was at this time, as Joan later said, that she finally obeyed the orders of her saints to lead an army against the English and Burgundians, explaining that God had taken pity on the French for the suffering they had endured. As a child, these visions had merely instructed her to, quote: "be good [or pious], [and] to go to church regularly"; but over the next several years they had persistently called for her to go to the local commander at Vaucouleurs to obtain an escort to take her to the Royal Court.

She said she finally obeyed in May of 1428, and found a way for a family relative, Durand Lassois, to take her to Vaucouleurs to speak with the garrison commander, Lord Robert de Baudricourt, who had remained loyal to the Armagnacs despite being a vassal of the pro-Burgundian Duke of Lorraine. Baudricourt refused to listen to her, and she returned home.

Shortly after her return, in July of 1428, Domremy found itself in the path of a Burgundian army led by Lord Jean de Vergy, forcing the villagers to take refuge in the nearby city of Neufchateau until the troops had passed. Vergy's army laid siege to Vaucouleurs and forced Baudricourt to pledge neutrality.

On October 12th Orleans was placed under siege by an English army under the Earl of Salisbury. The eyewitness accounts and other 15th century sources say that the situation for Charles was rather hopeless by that stage: his treasury at one point was down to less than "four ecus"; his armies were a motley collection of local feudal contingents and foreign mercenaries; and he himself, according to the surviving accounts, was torn with doubt over the validity of his cause - since his own mother, cooperating with the English, had allegedly declared him illegitimate in order to deny his claim to the throne. Now Orleans, the last major city defending the heart of his territory, was in the grip of an English army.

This was the situation facing his government, by that point located in the city of Chinon on the Vienne River, when Joan was finally granted Baudricourt's permission, after her third attempt, to go with an escort to speak with Charles. One account says that she convinced Baudricourt by accurately predicting a French defeat near Rouvray, north of Orleans, when an army under the Count of Clermont unsuccessfully tried to stop an English supply convoy bringing food to the besiegers around Orleans. When Baudricourt was informed of the disaster he promptly arranged for an armed escort to bring Joan through enemy territory to Chinon.

Following the standard procedure, her escorts dressed her in male clothing when camped in the fields with soldiers, for safety and modesty's sake. She would call herself "La Pucelle" (the Maiden or Virgin), explaining that she had promised her saints to keep her virginity "for as long as it pleases God", and it is by this nickname that she is usually described in the documents.

Chinon
After eleven days on the road, she arrived at Chinon around March 4th and was brought into Charles' presence, after a delay of two days, by Count Louis de Vendome.

There are many eyewitness accounts of this event: Lord Raoul de Gaucourt, a Royal commander and bailiff of Orleans, recalled that "...she presented herself before his Royal majesty with great humility and simplicity, a poor shepherd girl, and ... said to the King: 'Most illustrious lord Dauphin, I have come and am sent in the name of God to bring aid to yourself and to the kingdom."

However, Charles first wanted her to be examined by a group of theologians in order to test her orthodoxy, and for that purpose she was sent to the city of Poitiers about 30 miles to the south, where pro-Armagnac clergy from the University of Paris had congregated after Paris came under English occupation a decade earlier. She was questioned for three weeks before they gave her their approval [click here to see the official text of their conclusions] and told Charles that he could grant her titular command of an army - an arrangement which was occasionally given to religious visionaries during the medieval period.

While still at Poitiers she told a clergyman named Jean Erault to record an ultimatum to the English commanders at Orleans around March 22, the first of eleven surviving examples of the letters she dictated to scribes during the course of her military campaigns. In this ultimatum she begins with the "Jesus-Mary" slogan which would become her trademark (borrowed from the Catholic clergy known as mendicants - Dominicans, Franciscans, Carmelites, and Augustinians - who made up a large portion of the priests in her army). She then goes on to inform the English that the "son of Saint Mary" [i.e., Jesus Christ] supports Charles VII's claim to the throne, and repeatedly advises the English to "go away [back] to England" ("allez-vous-en en Angleterre") or she will "drive you out of France" ["bouter vous hors de France"].

The English, in place of a reply, would detain the two men who delivered the message. She would find that more forceful methods would be needed to convince the English to pull their troops out of the Loire Valley.

The Army
After providing her with a suit of armor "made exactly for her body" (in the words of one eyewitness), and a banner with a picture of "Our Savior" holding the world "with two angels at the sides", on a white background covered with gold fleurs-de-lis, they brought her to the army at Blois, about 35 miles southwest of Orleans.

It was here that she began to reform the troops by expelling the prostitutes from the camp (sometimes at sword point, according to several eyewitnesses) and requiring the soldiers to go to church and confession, give up swearing, and refrain from looting or harassing the civilian population.

Her arrival had another valuable effect on the army: men who would otherwise have refused to serve Charles' defeated cause now began to volunteer for the campaign, as word that a saint was now at the head of the army began to change minds.

Orleans
The army moved out from Blois around April 25th and arrived in stages at the besieged city between April 29th and May 4th. A small force had come out to meet them at Checy, five miles upriver from Orleans; but as there weren't enough barges to transport the entire body of troops across the river, Joan herself and a small group of soldiers were escorted into the city by Lord Jean d'Orleans (better known by his later title, Count of Dunois), the man in charge of the city's defense due to his status as the half-brother of the Duke of Orleans. The rest of the army would arrive later by a different route, its numbers greatly reduced by discouraged men who decided to leave without the Maiden there to encourage them.

On May 4th the rest of her troops made it into the city, and a few hours later an assault was launched against an English-held fortified church called Saint Loup, about a mile east of Orleans. The surviving accounts say that the position was carried after Joan rode up with her banner, encouraging the troops up and over the ramparts. The English casualties totaled 114 dead and 40 captured.

Her role in this engagement would become typical: two different sources quote her as saying that she always carried her banner into battle (rather than a weapon, as is sometimes supposed), since, as she explained, she didn't want to harm anyone; and there are many eyewitness accounts which repeatedly describe her encouraging the troops to greater efforts by placing herself in the same danger that they themselves faced.

On the following day she sent her final ultimatum to the English commanders at Orléans, this time having an archer deliver the note with an arrow rather than risk losing another messenger.

The remaining English positions fell swiftly: on May 6th an attack was made against a fortified monastery called the "Bastille des Augustins", which controlled the southern approach to a pair of towers called Les Tourelles, at the southern end of Orleans' bridge. Flanking these to the east was a fortified church called St-Jean-le-Blanc, near which the English had been bombarding the city with one of their largest cannons, called "le Passe-volant".

The French troops were sent over a pontoon bridge around the hour of Tierce (9 a.m.), and induced the English to abandon St-Jean-le-Blanc without a fight; the more substantial fortress of Les Augustins was then assaulted, with the saint leading the initial charge alongside La Hire. The fortress was then stormed and overrun with few losses. This placed Les Tourelles within striking range: during the course of the next morning's assault, Joan herself was wounded by an arrow while helping the soldiers set up a scaling ladder.

It seems she stayed behind the area of fighting for most of the day, but returned to the field near dusk in order to encourage the demoralized troops to one final effort which met with success. This proved to be decisive: the English abandoned the siege the next day, and moved their remaining troops off to Meung-sur-Loire and other positions along the river.
Orleans was the English high-water mark: never again would they come so close to achieving a final victory against Charles, who would soon be anointed as King Charles VII.

The Loire Valley and Reims

The unexpected lifting of the siege led to the support of a number of prominent figures. Duke Jean V of Brittany rejected his previous alliance with the English and promised to send troops to Charles' aid. The Archbishop of Embrun wrote a treatise [June 1429] declaring Joan to be divinely inspired, and advised Charles to consult with her on matters concerning the war.

The joy felt by Charles himself when he and Joan met again at Loches on the 11th was neatly summed up in an account by Eberhardt von Windecken: "... Then the young girl bowed her head before the King as much as she could, and the King immediately had her raise it again; and one would have thought that he would have kissed her from the joy that he experienced."

On the other side, the Duke of Bedford (the chief English commander in France) reacted by calling up as many troops as possible from English-occupied territory; the Duke of Burgundy made plans to take a more active role in helping his allies in the field, although as usual he demanded a modest sum (250,000 livres) to help offset his costs.

After the Dauphin's joyful reunion with the saint, she convinced him to take an army north to Reims to be crowned, as custom required. This was no simple task, since Reims at that time lay deep within enemy-held territory; in order to open a way for a northward campaign, the Royal army first set about the job of clearing out the remaining English positions in the Loire Valley, with the Duke of Alencon being given command of the venture.

The army's first target was Jargeau, ten miles to the southeast of Orleans. At least 3,600 armored troops, plus an unknown number of lightly-armed 'commons', were present for duty. The town was reached on June 11th; the main assault came the next day after an artillery bombardment in which Jargeau's largest tower was felled by a large cannon from Orleans nicknamed "La Bergere" ("the Shepherdess"), presumably named after the saint herself. The latter's role was also crucial: carrying her banner up front with the troops, she was hit in the helmet with a stone but immediately got back on her feet and encouraged the soldiers to storm the ramparts by shouting: "Friends, friends, up! Up! Our Lord has condemned the English". [In the archaic French of the 15th century: "Amys, amys, sus! Sus! Nostre Sire a condempne les Angloys"] The fortifications were taken, and the English were driven back across Jargeau's bridge. The survivors surrendered.
Beaugency was taken on the 17th after the English garrison negotiated an agreement allowing them to withdraw. That evening the English troops at Meung, reinforced by an army under Sir John Fastolf, offered battle to the French but subsequently decided to fall back the next day, riding northward in an effort to make it back to more secure territory. The French pursued (goaded on by Joan, saying in effect that they should use their "good spurs" to chase the enemy); the two armies clashed south of Patay, where a rapid cavalry charge led by La Hire and other nobles of the vanguard overran a line of 500 English archers which had been set up to delay the French as long as they could. Confusion among the main contingents of the English army completed the rout, and the French cavalry swept their opponents from the field. The English heralds announced their losses at 2,200 men, compared to only three casualties for the French - the reverse of so many other battles in that war.

The March to Reims

When Charles met his commanders after this victory, the decision was made to press on northward to Reims. Gathering the army together at Gien on the Loire, both Charles and Joan began sending out letters requesting various cities and dignitaries to send representatives to the coronation.

The Royal army finally moved out from Gien on the 29th, after a delay which caused Joan much distress. The Burgundian-held city of Auxerre was reached the next day, and an agreement with the city leaders was worked out after three days of negotiations: the army was allowed to buy food, and Auxerre agreed to pay the same obedience to Charles as Troyes, Chalons, and Reims chose to do.

The next stop was Troyes, garrisoned by 500-600 Burgundian troops.
On July 4th, at St. Phal near Troyes, she sent a letter to the citizens of the latter city asking them to declare themselves for Charles, adding that "with the help of King Jesus", Charles will enter all of the towns within his inheritance regardless of their wishes.
Troyes initially ignored the summons. While Charles' commanders debated their next course of action, Joan told them to promptly besiege the town, predicting they would gain it in three days "either by love or by force". Lord Dunois remembered that she then began ordering the placement of the troops, and did it so well that "two or three of the most famous and experienced soldiers" could not have done it better. Troyes surrendered the next day without a fight. The Royal army entered on the 10th; by the 14th it had reached Chalons-sur-Marne to the north, which opened its gates with greater promptitude than Troyes.

Reims followed suit after Joan counseled Charles to "advance boldly"; and at last the Dauphin was poised to receive the crown which had been denied him years earlier.
During the ceremony Joan stood near Charles, holding her banner. The memorable words of one 15th century source describes the scene: after Charles was crowned, Joan "wept many tears and said, 'Noble king, now is accomplished the pleasure of God, who wished me to lift the siege of Orleans, and to bring you to this city of Reims to receive your holy anointing, to show that you are the true king, and the one to whom the kingdom of France should belong.'" It adds: "All those who saw her were moved to great compassion."

The Siege of Paris

On July 17th, the day of the coronation, Joan sent a letter to the Duke of Burgundy asking why he didn't bother to show up for the coronation and proposing that he and Charles should, quote, "make a good firm lasting peace. Pardon each other completely and willingly, as loyal Christians should do; and if it should please you to make war, go against the Saracens." (The Islamic Saracens, frequently at war with Christendom, were one of her preferred targets for legitimate military action).

Although the Duke himself stayed away, his emissaries had arrived in Reims on the day of the coronation and began negotiations which resulted in a 15-day truce being declared - not exactly the "good, firm, lasting peace" that Joan wanted, and in fact such a short truce immediately following in the wake of Charles' triumph could serve only to give the English and Burgundians time to regroup.

Charles followed up this treaty by taking his army on a city-by-city tour of the Ile-de-France, accepting the loyalty of each in turn. Near Crepy-en-Valois, Joan was quoted as saying that she now hoped that God would permit her to return to her family's home. The army of the Duke of Bedford was nearby, however - Bedford had recently sent off a challenge to Charles VII asking him to meet the English at "some place in the fields, convenient and reasonable" for a showdown. The place turned out to be the village of Montpilloy just southwest of Crepy, where the two armies clashed on August 14th and 15th, with Joan herself going so far as to lead a charge against the English fortified positions to try to draw them out; but only a prolonged series of skirmishes took place, and both armies withdrew on the night of the 15th.

The French went back to Crepy, and then proceeded on to Compiegne to the northwest. At the same time negotiations with the Burgundians were getting underway, with the positions of the two parties oddly reversed: while French armies were rapidly advancing, the French delegation was offering sweeping concessions, bargaining as if they were on the losing side. On the 21st a treaty was signed providing for a four-month truce designed to prevent the Royal army from continuing its offensive, coupled with the added provision that several towns should be handed over to the Duke of Burgundy. A peace conference was promised for the spring, although the documents show that the English were preparing to launch an offensive around the same time.

Meanwhile, King Charles remained at Compiegne. On the 23rd Joan and the Duke of Alencon left on their own initiative with a body of troops and made their way to the region around Paris, arriving at St-Denis on the 25th and sending out skirmishers "up to the gates of Paris" over the next several days. A brief siege began on September 8th, but Joan was hit in the thigh that day by a crossbow dart while trying to find a place for her troops to cross the city's inner moat. She was carried back against her will, all the while urging on another assault. No further attack would be forthcoming: on the 9th the army was ordered back to St-Denis, where the King was located by that point; when he learned that the commanders were thinking of crossing back to Paris by a bridge constructed on the orders of the Duke of Alencon, Charles ordered the bridge destroyed. On the 13th the troops began the discouraging march back to the Loire. On September 21st the army, by then back at Gien, was disbanded. The Duke of Alencon's squire and chronicler, Perceval de Cagny, summed up this event with the terse and bitter statement: "And thus was broken the will of the Maiden and the King's army." Like many of those who had served in that army, Cagny tended to feel that the disastrous policies promoted by the Royal counselors - most blamed Georges de la Tremoille in particular - had fatally undermined Joan's successes.

The commanders were dispersed to their own estates or former areas of operations. When the Duke of Alencon, preparing a campaign into Normandy, asked that Joan be allowed to join him, the Royal court refused.

Winter

During this period of inactivity, Joan was moved around to various residences of the Royal court, such as at Bourges and Sully-sur-Loire. The next military venture, albeit a fairly small one, was the attack against Saint-Pierre-le-Moutier, which was captured on November 4. Jean d'Aulon, Joan's squire and bodyguard, remembered that the initial assault was a failure and the soldiers in full retreat, except for Joan herself and a handful of men clustered around her. He rode up to her and told her to fall back with the rest of the army, but she refused, declaring that she had "fifty-thousand" troops with her. Shouting for the army to bring up bundles for filling in the town's moat, she initiated a new assault which took the objective "without much resistance", according to the astonished d'Aulon.
The next target was the town of La-Charite-sur-Loire. Since the army was undersupported by the Royal court, she sent letters off to nearby cities asking them to donate supplies. Clermont-Ferrand responded by sending two hundredweight of saltpeter, an equal amount of sulfur, and two bundles of arrows.

The siege of La Charite was a dismal failure: the weather was chilly by that point in the year; the army had "few men"; the Royal court did little to provide support for the troops ("the King", according to Cagny, "made no diligence to send her food supplies nor money to maintain her army"). The army withdrew after a month, abandoning their artillery.
She spent the rest of the winter at various Royal estates while the English and Burgundians regrouped for a new campaign.

The month of March 1430 saw a flurry of letters being sent out by Joan, all of them dictated in the town of Sully-sur-Loire. Two of these, on the 16th and 28th, went to the citizens of Reims, assuring them that she would aid them in the event of a siege. On March 23rd she sent an ultimatum to the Hussites, addressed as "the heretics of Bohemia", warning that she would lead a crusading army against them unless they "return to the Catholic faith and the original Light".

In late March or early April Joan finally took the field again with her small group (her brother Pierre, her confessor Friar Jean Pasquerel, her bodyguard Jean d'Aulon, and a few others), escorted by a mercenary unit of about 200 troops led by Bartolomew Baretta of Italy. They headed for Lagny-sur-Marne, where French forces were putting up a fight against the English. It was here, in the midst of war, that she was credited with helping to save an infant: according to her own testimony, she and other virgins of the town were praying in a church on behalf of a dead baby, that it might be revived long enough to baptize it; she said the baby came to life, yawned three times, and was hastily baptized before it died again.
Around Easter (April 22nd) she was at Melun where, as she would later say, her saints had revealed to her that she would be captured "before Saint John's Day" (June 24). She had said at many points that capture and betrayal were her greatest fears.

Meanwhile the Burgundian army was on the move despite all the promises of peace; and on May 6th Charles VII and his counselors finally admitted that the Royal Court had been manipulated by the Duke, "...who has diverted and deceived us by truces and otherwise", as Charles wrote in a letter on that date.
He would now order a damaging series of assaults on Burgundian territory to the east, but in the northeast the Armagnacs were in trouble: the Duke of Burgundy was now there in force. His strategy, based on an elaborate document outlining his plans, called for the bridge at Choisy-au-Bac to be taken, followed by the monastery at Verberie, and then a methodical series of assaults to block all the supply routes into Compiegne, which had refused to submit to him under the terms of the agreement signed the previous year. Choisy-au-Bac was taken on May 16; on the 22nd the Duke laid siege to Compiègne. Joan was unwilling to let this city, which had showed such courage in its defiance, fall unaided: reinforced with 300 - 400 additional troops picked up at Crepy-en-Valois, on the morning of the 23rd at sunrise she and her tiny army slipped into Compiegne.
She apparently knew what was coming: according to the later statements of two men who had, as young boys, been among a group of curious children watching Joan pray in one of Compiegne's churches that morning, she was much troubled in spirit and told the children to "pray for me, for I have been betrayed." Later that day she was among those leading a sortie against the enemy camp at Margny when her troops were ambushed by Burgundian forces concealed behind a hill called the Mont-de-Clairoix. Having decided to stay with the rearguard during the retreat, she and her soldiers were trapped outside the city and pinned up against the river when the drawbridge was prematurely raised behind them. Burgundian troops swarmed around her, each asking her to surrender. She refused, and was finally pulled off her horse by an enemy archer. A nobleman named Lionel of Wandomme, in the service of John of Luxembourg, made her his captive.
A Burgundian chronicler who was present, Enguerrand de Monstrelet, wrote that the Armagnacs were devastated by Joan's capture, while the English and Burgundians were "overjoyed, more so than if they had taken 500 combatants, for they had never feared or dreaded any other commander... as much as they had always feared this maiden up until that day."
The garrison commander at Compiegne, Guillaume de Flavy, came under immediate suspicion as a traitor, although his guilt was never proved. Since the Royal Court at that time was divided into factions, each of which routinely tried to eliminate any prominent leader who was supported by their rivals, it would be likely that a small group within the Court may have betrayed her. The evidence indicates that Charles VII probably was not among the guilty, however, nor did he abandon her, as is so often claimed: according to the archives of the Morosini, who were in contact with the Royal Court, Charles VII tried to force the Burgundians to return Joan in exchange for the usual ransom, and threatened to treat Burgundian prisoners according to whatever standard was adopted in Joan's case. The pro-Anglo-Burgundian University of Paris, which later helped arrange her conviction, sent an alarmed letter to John of Luxembourg reporting that the Armagnacs were "doing everything in their power" to try to get her back. Dunois and La Hire would lead four campaigns during that winter and the following spring which seem to have been designed to rescue her by military means.
These attempts failed, and the Burgundians refused to ransom her.

The Trial

After four months spent as a prisoner in the chateau of Beaurevoir, Joan was transferred to the English in exchange for 10,000 livres, much as Henry V had similarly paid his nobles for transferring their prisoners to him after the battle of Agincourt. Pierre Cauchon, a longtime supporter of the Anglo-Burgundian faction, was given the job of procuring her and setting up a trial. He had been given many such tasks in the past: a letter from Duke John-the-Fearless of Burgundy, dated 26 July 1415, authorized Cauchon to bribe Church officials at the Council of Constance in order to influence the Council's ruling concerning a murder which the Duke had ordered. They now needed someone who was willing to engineer a murder under the guise of an Inquisitorial trial, and Cauchon again got the job.
English government documents record in great detail the payments made to cover the costs of obtaining Joan and rewarding the various judges and assessors who took part in her trial [click here to see some of these financial accounts], and we know that the clergy who served at the trial were drawn from their supporters. Some of these men later admitted that the English conducted the proceedings for the purposes of revenge rather than out of any genuine belief that she was a heretic. [click here to see some of this testimony]

Joan was held at the fortress of Crotoy before being brought to Rouen, the seat of the English occupation government. Although Inquisitorial procedure required suspects to be held in a Church-run prison and female prisoners to be guarded by nuns rather than male guards (for obvious reasons), Joan was held in a secular military prison with English soldiers as guards. According to several eyewitness accounts, it was for this reason that she clung to her soldiers' outfit and kept the pants and tunic "firmly laced and tied together": the trial transcript says that she wore two layers of such pants, both attached to the tunic with a total of over two dozen cords, and many eyewitnesses quoted her as saying that this was now her only means of defending herself against rape, since a dress didn't offer any such protection. The tribunal eventually decided to use this against her by charging that it violated the prohibition against cross-dressing, a charge which intentionally ignored the exemption allowed in such cases of necessity by medieval doctrinal sources such as the "Summa Theologica" and "Scivias". The eyewitnesses said that Joan pleaded with Cauchon to transfer her to a Church prison with women to guard her, in which case she could safely wear a dress; but this was never allowed.

The trial included a series of hearings from February 21st through the end of March 1431. Normally, Inquisitorial tribunals were supposed to hear witness testimony against the accused and base any verdict upon such testimony, but in this case the only witness called was the accused herself. The trial assessors, as a number of them later admitted, therefore resorted to trying to manipulate her into saying something that might be used against her. There were other profound deviations from lawful procedure. As many historians have pointed out, the theological arguments put forward by Cauchon and his associates are mostly a set of subtle half-truths, not only on the "cross-dressing" charge but also concerning issues such as the authority of the tribunal: standard Inquisitorial procedure required such tribunals to be overseen by non-partisan judges, otherwise the trial could be automatically rendered null and void; similarly, the accused was allowed to appeal to the Pope. The eyewitnesses said Joan repeatedly asked for both of these rules to be honored, but such was never granted. These eyewitnesses likewise related that she submitted to the authority of both the Papacy and the Council of Basel, but the latter was left out of the transcript on Cauchon's orders and the former was entered in a form which distorted her statements on the matter. The dispute between Joan and her judges therefore largely revolved around the legitimacy of the tribunal as an impartial jury of the Church Universal, and medieval ecclesiastic law is on her side here. [click here for more information about this issue].
Early in the trial an attempt was made to link her to witchcraft by claiming her banner had been endowed with "magical" powers, that she allegedly poured wax on the heads of small children, and other accusations of this sort, but these charges were dropped before the final articles of accusation were drawn up on April 5th. In one of the more desperate bids to discredit her, Cauchon objected to her use of the "Jesus-Mary" slogan which, ironically, was used by the Dominicans and Franciscans who largely ran the Inquisitorial courts. Her saints were dismissed as "demons", despite the transcript's own description that they had counseled her to "go regularly to Church" and maintain her virginity.
In the end, Cauchon would convict her on the cross-dressing charge, which he utilized in a manner which gives an indication of his character. According to several eyewitnesses - the trial bailiff Jean Massieu, the chief notary Guillaume Manchon, the assessors Friar Martin Ladvenu and Friar Isambart de la Pierre, and the Rouen citizen Pierre Cusquel - after Joan had finally consented to wear a dress, her guards immediately increased their attempts to rape her, joined by "a great English lord" who tried to do the same. Her guards finally took away her dress entirely and threw her the old male clothing which she was forbidden to wear, sparking a bitter argument between she and the guards that "went on until noon", according to the bailiff. She had no choice but to put on the clothing left to her, after which Cauchon promptly pronounced her a "relapsed heretic" and condemned her to death. Several eyewitnesses remembered that Cauchon came out of the prison and exclaimed to the Earl of Warwick and other English commanders waiting outside: "Farewell, be of good cheer, it is done!", implying that he had orchestrated the trap that the guards had set for her.

The scene of her execution is vividly described by a number of those who were present that day. She listened calmly to the sermon read to her, but then broke down weeping during her own address, in which she forgave her accusers for what they were doing and asked them to pray for her. The accounts say that most of the judges and assessors themselves, and a few of the English soldiers and officials, were openly sobbing by the end of it. But a few of the English soldiers were becoming impatient, and one sarcastically shouted to the bailiff Jean Massieu, "What, priest, are you going to make us wait here until dinner?" The executioner was ordered to "do your duty".

They tied her to a tall pillar well above the crowd. She asked for a cross, which one sympathetic English soldier tried to provide by making a small one out of wood. A crucifix was brought from the nearby church and Friar Martin Ladvenu held it up in front of her until the flames rose. Several eyewitnesses recalled that she repeatedly screamed "...in a loud voice the holy name of Jesus, and implored and invoked without ceasing the aid of the saints of Paradise". Then her head drooped, and it was over.

Jean Tressard, Secretary to the King of England, was seen returning from the execution exclaiming in great agitation, "We are all ruined, for a good and holy person was burned." The Cardinal of England himself and the Bishop of Therouanne, brother of the same John of Luxembourg whose troops had captured Joan, were said to have wept bitterly. The executioner, Geoffroy Therage, confessed to Martin Ladvenu and Isambart de la Pierre afterwards, saying that "...he had a great fear of being damned, [as] he had burned a saint." The worried English authorities tried to put a stop to any further talk of this sort by punishing those few who were willing to publicly speak out in her favor: the legal records show a number of prosecutions during the following days.

It would not be until the English were finally driven from Rouen in November of 1449, near the end of the war, that the slow process of appealing the case would be initiated. This process resulted in a posthumous acquittal by an Inquisitor named Jean Bréhal, who had paradoxically been a member of an English-run institution during the war. Bréhal nevertheless ruled that she had been convicted illegally and without basis by a corrupt court operating in a spirit of "...manifest malice against the Roman Catholic Church, and indeed heresy". The Inquisitor and other theologians consulted for the appeal therefore denounced Cauchon and the other judges and described Joan as a martyr, thereby paving the way for her eventual beatification in 1909 and canonization as a saint in 1920, by which time even English writers and clergy no longer showed the opposition that their predecessors had. During World War I, in the midst of the canonization process and a period of French-English detente, Allied soldiers would pay tribute to the heroine by invoking her name on battlefields not far from her own.